theglobaljournal.net: Latest activities of group Francis Gurryhttp://www.theglobaljournal.net/group/francis-gurry/2012-03-20T12:13:59ZThe Shift of Power2012-03-20T12:13:59Zhttp://www.theglobaljournal.net/article/view/383/<p style="text-align: justify;"><img style="float: left; margin-left: 10px; margin-right: 10px;" src="/s3/cache%2Fc5%2F55%2Fc55520608fc8c98570e1be323624a178.jpg" alt="Francis Gurry" width="146" height="220" /><span style="color: #7f0a0a; font-style: italic;">Interview with Francis Gurry,&nbsp;WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization) Director General.</span></p> <p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #800000;"><strong>I</strong><strong>magine that your organization didn&rsquo;t exist and you were&nbsp;</strong><strong>asked to invent it. What would you build? How would it&nbsp;</strong><strong>be fundamentally different from the existing organization?&nbsp;</strong><strong>What would the differences be regarding mandate, resources&nbsp;</strong><strong>and objectives?</strong></span></p> <p style="text-align: justify;">First of all I should acknowledge all that has been done collectively&nbsp;in the organization. As that has taken place over the&nbsp;course of more than 100 years, it&rsquo;s quite a successful example&nbsp;of international cooperation when you look back. So I couldn&rsquo;t,&nbsp;and wouldn&rsquo;t wish to, change that history. Now, of course, we&nbsp;are in a very different world from the one of 1880, so naturally&nbsp;one would organize things differently.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: justify;">What are the major changes? Well, I think the first set of&nbsp;changes is to do with globalization - the increased capacity for&nbsp;the movement of people, goods, services and ideas, and the&nbsp;technologies that facilitate that movement. The second area&nbsp;of change is around information and communication technology,&nbsp;including social media, which means that all organizations&nbsp;communicate internally and externally in a vastly different manner&nbsp;from the way in which they did previously. The third major&nbsp;change has been the redefinition of the roles of private and public&nbsp;sectors over the course of the last 120 years.&nbsp;&lsquo;Who does what&rsquo;&nbsp;has changed considerably, as well as the relative power of the&nbsp;public and private sectors. Nowadays it is quite common for corporations&nbsp;to possess much more economic power than many&nbsp;States. Fourthly, there has been a shift in the balance of power&nbsp;with respect to the control of information. Once, we thought&nbsp;that elected governments possessed the information to enable&nbsp;them to take decisions, and we expected them to decide. Now&nbsp;of course, with the Internet and the democratization of information,&nbsp;this assumption is no longer valid. A lot more people have&nbsp;a lot more information, and the consequent changes in public&nbsp;and private roles are very significant. Another major difference&nbsp;between now and the 1880s is the vast change in the geography&nbsp;of economic and technological production.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: justify;">What do all these changes mean with respect to the design of&nbsp;this organization? I would say a couple of things: substance&nbsp;and modality. As for substance, throughout this period there&nbsp;has been an increase and expansion of the knowledge component&nbsp;in production, and this means that innovation and creativity&nbsp;have become much more important. Perhaps WIPO should&nbsp;now make innovation its primary focus, become the World&nbsp;Innovation Promotion Organization rather than the World Intellectual&nbsp;Property Organization. This is not incompatible with the&nbsp;original mission, where IP was the instrument and principal&nbsp;public policy concerning information. There are other routes&nbsp;to innovation than just intellectual property &ndash; although intellectual&nbsp;property remains the core.&nbsp;As for modality, the means through&nbsp;which influence is exerted, the changes&nbsp;mean that we have to take into account&nbsp;the multi-stakeholder process to a&nbsp;greater extent than the traditional Westphalian&nbsp;system would suggest. In our&nbsp;present world you cannot deal with policy&nbsp;through States alone. We need to&nbsp;take into account the shifts in power.&nbsp;The balance of power in information&nbsp;control has changed; the balance of economic&nbsp;power has changed. There are a&nbsp;lot of changes; they are terrifying changes for some people and&nbsp;for some states, but we have to acknowledge this evolution. So,&nbsp;the new framework has to involve multi-stakeholders.</p> <p style="text-align: justify;">To read the full interview, order a copy of the <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.theglobaljournal.ch/product.php?id_product=29">magazine</a>.</p>WIPO DG Francis Gurry: Newspapers Going Extinct2011-10-07T08:54:47Zhttp://www.theglobaljournal.net/article/view/254/<p>What is the future of printed media? Are we heading towards the disappearance of the traditional newspapers&nbsp;or a re-birth of the printed media through the digital world by the use of technology&nbsp;? Francis Gurry, head of the World Intellectual Property Organisation, seemed to have a clear answer this week (Oct. 3), stating that "In a few years, there will no longer be printed newspapers as we know it today." &nbsp;</p> <p>Gurry continued, "It's an evolution. There's no good or bad about it. There are studies showing that they will disappear by 2040. In the United States, it will end in 2017," adding that in the United States there are already more digital copies of newspapers sold than paper ones, and bookshops are decreasing in cities. Gurry cited revenue as the central issue, asking&nbsp;"How can editors find revenues to pay those who write these articles?" and noting that "the copyright system must be safeguarded as a mechanism to pay these writers."</p> <p>Already last year, the New York Times reported a 9% decline in average weekday circulation, no doubt as a result of a changing culture influenced by the advent of the Ipad, Wikileaks, Twitter and Facebook.&nbsp;</p>Global Patent System Marks Two Millionth Filing2011-04-15T14:36:33Zhttp://www.theglobaljournal.net/article/view/83/<p>The Geneva-based World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) received its two millionth international patent application in April, a landmark which WIPO hopes will encourage companies and inventors in multiple countries to seek patents.</p> <p>&nbsp;WIPOs Patent Corporation Treaty (PCT) launched in 1978 was designed to promote information sharing among patent offices and avoid duplication. Until a few years ago, the United States and Europe were the largest users.&nbsp; East Asia is however, quickly catching up with a registered increase in applications last year from China, South Korea and Japan.</p> <p>&nbsp;The two millionth application was filed by the US-based mobile technology company Qualcomm.&nbsp; A few days earlier, China&rsquo;s Zoom Technologies announced in Beijing that it will develop mobile phones based on Qualcomm's third-generation," mobile technology.</p> <p>&nbsp;The US Ambassador to international organizations in Geneva, Betty King, said she was pleased that a US company is being honored for its filing and noted that &ldquo;Qualcomm is now not just an American Company, but a company with global operations.&rdquo;</p> <p>&nbsp;It took 26 years for WIPO to receive the first one million PCT applications, according to WIPO Director General Francis Gurry. &ldquo;Rapidly growing use of the PCT over the past six years &ndash; the time it took to go from one to two million international patent applications &ndash; reflects increasing investments in innovation and the growing importance of protecting innovation.&rdquo;</p> <p>&nbsp;Under the PCT approximately 160,000 international patent applications are filed every year. The resulting database is an important collection of information about the &lsquo;state of the art&rsquo; in all fields of technology and can be used by companies and individual inventors to understand what the competition is doing and inspire further innovation.</p>